Netflix has come under fire for its use of potentially AI-manipulated images in the true-crime documentary “What Jennifer Did,” as reported by Futurism.
Some photos in the film exhibit noticeable signs of AI manipulation, such as distorted hands and unusual visual artifacts. If true, these allegations raise serious questions about the integrity of using images in documentaries, particularly when depicting individuals awaiting retrial while serving prison sentences.
One particularly concerning image depicts severe damage to the left hand of the documentary subject, Jennifer Pan, while others show peculiar gaps in her cheek. While Netflix has yet to issue an official response to these reports, the images display clear signs of manipulation without any labeling indicating AI processing.
It’s likely that AI generated the images based on original photos of Jennifer Pan, as suggested by PetaPixel. However, such manipulative outcomes could introduce bias and prejudice, potentially blurring the presentation of facts in the case.
The Canadian appellate court has ordered a retrial for Pan because the previous trial judge did not provide sufficient options to the jury, according to CBC reports.
Critics, like journalist Karen K. HO, have denounced Netflix’s documentary as an example of the “real crime industrial complex,” catering to a vast and insatiable demand for violent content. The potential use of AI-modified images in Netflix storytelling could bolster this argument.
Regulators in the US, Europe, and other regions have enacted laws regarding AI use. However, there are currently no specific regulations governing the use of AI-generated images or videos in documentaries or other content.
See other roonby’s articles for daily inspiration. Also, don’t forget to check out our Facebook page to get the latest information.