Genshin Impact Players Banned for 11 Years Because of This

A Genshin Impact player in China has been hit with an astonishingly long 11-year ban from the game. The cause of this severe penalty? The player named their dragon after a prominent public figure, an act that has sparked significant discussion about the game’s naming regulations.

The Incident That Made a Genshin Impact Player Getting Banned 11 Years

The controversy revolves around a player who chose the name “Gu Ailing” for their dragon in Genshin Impact. This name happens to be that of a well-known freestyle skiing athlete who represented China in the 2022 Winter Olympics held in Beijing.

According to Chinese regulations and game policies, naming characters or entities after public figures, especially respected athletes, is prohibited. This rule is in place to prevent any potential disrespect towards these individuals, who are highly regarded in China.

The enforcement of such rules reflects the broader cultural respect and the importance of adhering to national guidelines in gaming environments.

The Rule and Its Implications

China’s strict regulations on naming in online games are part of a larger framework designed to uphold cultural and social standards. Public figures, including athletes, are held in high regard, and any act perceived as disrespectful can have serious repercussions. In this case, the use of the athlete’s name in a game led to the player receiving an 11-year ban, a duration that highlights the seriousness of the offense.

Another player faced a similar situation, receiving the same lengthy ban for a comparable infraction. This individual attempted to appeal the decision through customer service, but as of now, it remains unclear whether their account will be reinstated or if the ban will be upheld.

The decision has sparked a range of reactions within the Genshin Impact community and beyond. Some players are questioning the fairness and proportionality of such a severe penalty, while others understand the need for cultural respect and adherence to local regulations. The incident raises important questions about the balance between game regulations and cultural sensitivities, but what do you guys think?